Angkor Logo

Ban Lum Khao

Ban Lum Khao is a Bronze Age cemetery overlying a thin occupation layer, which also belongs to the Bronze Age. Our excavations in 1995-96 uncovered 110 burials, laid out in rows and associated with a range of mortuary offerings which include pottery vessels, freshwater bivalve shellfish, pig and fish bones and bangles made of marine shell and exotic stone. Although the remains of crucibles and moulds were found in associated layers, no grave contained bronze grave goods. The condition of the human bone was excellent, and the remains of men, women, children and infants were found laid out in a similar manner to those identified at the nearby cemetery of Ban Prasat. Five radiocarbon dates have been obtained from the lowest occupation layer.

Ban Lum Khao is a prehistoric settlement located at the junction of two small streams, about 3 km west of the well known site of Ban Prasat (Monkhonkamnuanket 1992). Our excavations of 1995-6 uncovered an area of 15 by 10 metres, and reached the natural substrate at a depth of up to 1.7 m. Our intention at this site, was to investigate the Bronze Age occupation of the upper Mun Valley. The stratigraphic sequence began with an occupation layer incorporating a series of pits rich in organic remains including fish, shellfish, mammalian bones, turtles and much pottery. The second layer incorporated a Bronze Age cemetery, with some graves cut well into the natural substrate. This was followed with layer 3, a late Bronze Age occupation.

No in situ charcoal was found in association with the inhumation graves, but much was encountered in the pits. Burnt bamboo fibres were also found in layer 1 contexts. The results of the radiocarbon determinations are set out below. Our excavation of the natural substrate failed to evidence any charcoal remains at the depths reached by the pits which supplied charcoal for dating, and we are confident that the dated material originated with the initial occupation of this part of the site. The dates indicate initial settlement in the second half of the second millennium BC. We have not yet begun the detailed examination of the material culture, but are reasonably confident that the earliest occupants were familiar with bronze.

The cemetery included males, females, children and infants laid out in a patterned manner, as is virtually always the case in Central and Northeastern Thailand. The infants were interred in lidded burial jars over half a metre in diameter, often in association with smaller ceramic vessels and ornaments. These burial jars were, in virtually all cases, found beyond the head of an adult. The adults were interred with the preferred orientation of the head to the southeast, the mortuary ritual prescribing the inclusion in the grave of complete pottery vessels. Many adults were also buried with either shell or stone bangles, shell disc beads, and large, nacreous freshwater bivalve shellfish. No bronze artefacts were found with any of the 110 burials uncovered.

The ceramics

The early pits included much cord marked ware, but also examples of black pottery decorated with incised bands infilled with stamped impressions.

Complete pottery vessels, of which over 400 were recovered from burials, are currently being reconstructed. The forms include footed jars with broadly flaring upper bodies in which the body of the pot is cord-marked, and the upper part, red slipped and burnished. These are identical with those recovered from Ban Prasat. Forms, however, are many. There are small footed open bowls, cord-marked vessels with small everted rims, round based vessels with cord marked and burnished, red slipped decoration, pedestalled bowls with curvilinear, painted designs and round based bowls with red slip which has been selectively scraped away to form curvilinear designs. Late burials also include a developed range of forms, in which the upper part of the body is cylindrical in form, rather than everted.

Other items of material culture

The bangles found as grave offerings were fashioned from marine shell, including trochus and conus, and from exotic stone such as marble. Some of the latter are in the widely-distributed T cross section. Some people were buried with stone adzes, but most came from non-mortuary contexts. Nearly all were shouldered, and had been subjected to regular resharpening such that the shoulders were vestigial. We also found a number of shouldered bone implements which have the same form as the adzes. Some burials incorporated cord-marked cylinders of burnt clay which may have been used for investing moulds prior to bronze casting. These were rich in rice chaff temper. At least one clay bivalve mould, and a small number of corroded fragments of bronze, were recovered from layer 2. We also encountered many clay pellet-bow pellets, some complete and other fragments of clay bovid figurines, sandstone abraders and bone implements recalling the so-called shuttles from Khok Phanom Di. There was a vigorous antler industry, to judge from the many fragments of antler which had been cut to remove tabs.

The faunal remains

The excavation procedure incorporated the flotation of samples from all contexts, and in the case of the lower pits, the wet sieving and flotation of the entire contents. This resulted in a very large sample of microfauna, which includes the remains of freshwater fish, frogs, turtles, birds and small mammals. Thosarat has noted that many of the fish from early contexts are very much larger than their modern counterparts. Larger bones from layer 1 include the wild water buffalo, many middle sized deer which probably come from Cervus eldi, some large pig bones and a few bones from the domestic dog. With layer 2, the wild water buffalo bones became rare, and deer bones were less prevalent. Domestic-sized cattle and pigs, however, proliferated. Our initial impression on completing the identification of the larger component of the fauna, is that the inhabitants entered a hitherto unoccupied territory and exploited the many wild animals they encountered. This receives support from Mason's preliminary assessment of the shellfish: the individuals were large, and represent a low-lying, aquatic habitat.

External relations

The closest parallel clearly lies with the cemetery at Ban Prasat, which exhibits an identical material culture and mortuary ritual. The same pottery vessels have also been recovered from the lower layers of Noen U-Loke. It is less easy to find parallels with the layer 1 ceramics, other than to suggest that from descriptions in the literature, the tradition could correspond to the Tamyae Phase of Welch and McNeil (1988-9). There are some parallels in the shell and stone ornaments, clay bivalve mould casting technology and the clay figurines with Bronze Age sites both on the Khorat Plateau and in Central Thailand. Some of the pottery and its decoration also recalls that from the cemetery of Non Nok Tha. The chronological context in the later second millennium to the early first millennium BC should occasion no surprised for a Bronze Age cemetery in this part of Southeast Asia.

By Professor Charles Higham.
 
 

Back to Origins of Angkor Homepage

jchetwin@ihug.co.nz