![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protecting Marine Animals: A Law, Policy and Science SymposiumWith fishing activities posing a serious threat to endemic marine animals, is our law and policy providing sufficient protection? On 19th November 2009, we brought together some of the leading science, law and policy thinkers to explore the future possibilities for protecting marine animals with the Marine Animals Protection Law Reform Bill now defeated, the sea lion Population Management Plan abandoned, and the High Court review of the proposed dolphin protection regulations due any day. Speakers included (updated 11 Nov 09): Hon. Jim Anderton (leader of the Progressive Party) implemented the most comprehensive protection measures for Hector’s dolphin in 2008. He was Minister of Fisheries at the time and the fishing industry challenged this decision in court. In his talk “Does the law support sustainability of our fisheries?” he uses the Hectors Dolphin issue as a good example of why the Fisheries Act needs changing. In essence, the Act requires the Minister to keep allowing fishing to continue until he/she can PROVE that sustainability is threatened. The fishing industry argues that this is not true and points to all sorts of provisions and examples that support their view. But this is the practical reality of the way the law functions at present. Where Fisheries' Ministers have been able to be precautionary in the past, this is usually where the industry (for its own reasons) has decided not to challenge their decision. Shaun McConkey, Elm Wildlife Tours, Chairman of New Zealand Sealion Trust Associate Professor Liz Slooten from the Zoology Department at Otago University has carried out research on Hector's dolphin since 1984. Her research has been instrumental in the development of protection measures for this endemic dolphin species. Liz Slooten’s talk will discuss a comprehensive new package of protection measures for Hector’s dolphin, put in place by Hon. Jim Anderton last year. The effectiveness of these protection measures will be compared with past management and with the rate of population recovery in the absence of fisheries mortality. Raewyn Peart, Senior Policy Analyst, Environmental Defence Society Hon. Metiria Turei (co-leader of the Green Party) will discuss her Marine Animals Protection Bill. This Private Member's Bill was pulled from the ballot earlier this year, but voted down by the National/Act government. It would have made major reforms to the Fisheries, Wildlife and Marine Mammals Protection Acts by incorporating a precautionary principle. The bill provided clear processes to enable Ministers to make fisheries and population management plan decisions that would improve the populations of threatened fish and other marine animals. Metiria will consider the drivers behind the bill, what other potential reforms arise from those issues and the politics behind it. Nicola Wheen from the Law School at Otago University is an expert on environmental law. She has written extensively on the legal obstacles to better protection of New Zealand's marine animals. Her talk on “How the law lets down the down under dolphin” closely examines the legislation and case law concerning fishing-related mortality of marine animals. Nicola Wheen will identify specific limitations on the existing legal regime and explain the reforms proposed in the recently-defeated Marine Animals Law Reform Protection Bill. This paper is intended as a basis for discussion of further reform proposals aimed at improving existing legislation.
The New Zealand Fisheries Act 1996 was enacted with the express purpose of implementing international and domestic concerns about protection of the marine environment. Importantly, it incorporates the precautionary principle in s 10. However, recent cases have challenged and struck down decisions where the Minister of Fisheries purported to rely on the precautionary principle to support measures protecting marine mammals from the effects of commercial fishing activities. Moreover, the challengers have argued that s 10 doesn’t just protect the environment, but also protects the commercial utilisation of fish stocks. This paper discusses the history and operation of s 10, the recent amendments to the legislation, and the preferred interpretation in respect of the precautionary principle. The paper makes suggestions for how the section incorporating the precautionary principle can be used to better uphold its intended purpose of environmental protection.
Organising Team: Liz Slooten, Nicola Wheen and Jacinta Ruru Press Release - http://www.otago.ac.nz/news/news/2009/27-10-09_press_release.html
http://www.otago.ac.nz/humanities/research/clusters/naturalresources/index.html
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclaimer | Feedback | ||||||||||||||||||||||