|

|
New Zealand sea lion
Bycatch of NZ sea lions in the southern trawl fishery for squid has increased substantially over the last 5 years, as the method of calculating the annual allowable bycatch has changed. Until 2004 sealion "quotas" were calculated using a method developed by the US National Marine Fisheries Service. This method was developed over the course of a decade of investigation, by a large team of marine mammal biologists and fisheries scientists.
Until 2004 an average of 60-70 sealions were allowed to be caught each year. Since then, the quota has increased to around 100 sealions per year, with limits of 115 and 150 in some years. These bycatch limits are based on a management model jointly developed by NIWA and the fishing industry.
Problems with the new way of setting quotas include: 1. The model failed to predict recent reductions in pup numbers. 2. The model has great difficulty estimating original population size and maximum population growth rate, producing biologically unrealistic estimates of both. 3.Pups that dies as a consequence of the mother's death are not included in the analysis. 4. The model ignores the fact that the Auckland Islands sea lion population is a small fraction of the original range of the species. 5. The use of sea lion exclusion devices means that no reliable estimates of current bycatch are available.
The increase in allowable catches is surprising, given that recent research on the sealions indicates that the population is declining.
Key Researchers: Simon Childerhouse, Liz Slooten
References
Burkhart, S.M. and Slooten, E. Population viability analysis for Hector's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori): A stochastic population model for local populations. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37: 553-566 (2003)
Dawson, S., Pichler, F., Slooten, E., Russell, K. and Baker, C.S. The North Island Hector’s dolphin is vulnerable to extinction. Marine Mammal Science 17 (2): 366-371 (2001)
Dawson, S.M. and Slooten, E. Management of gillnet bycatch of cetaceans in New Zealand. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7: 59-64 (2005)
Dawson, S.M., Read, A. and Slooten, E. Pingers, porpoises and power: Uncertainties with using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans. Biological Conservation 84(2): 141-146 (1998)
Martien, K.K., Taylor, B.L., Slooten, E. and Dawson, S. A sensitivity analysis to guide research and management for Hector’s dolphin. Biological Conservation 90: 183-191 (1999)
Slooten, E. Conservation management in the face of uncertainty: Effectiveness of four options for managing Hector's dolphin bycatch. Endangered Species Research 3: 169-179 (2007) www.int-res.com/journals /esr/esr-home/
Slooten, E., Dawson, S.M., Rayment, W.J. and Childerhouse, S.J. A new abundance estimate for Maui’s dolphin: What does it mean for managing this critically endangered species? Biological Conservation 128: 576-581 Available online 18 November (2005)
Slooten, E., Dawson, S.M., Rayment, W.J. and Childerhouse, S.J. Distribution of Maui’s dolphin, Cephalorhynchus hectori maui. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2005/28, 21p. Published by Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington (2005)
Slooten, E., Fletcher, D. and Taylor, B.L. Accounting for uncertainty in risk assessment: Case study of Hector's dolphin mortality due to gillnet entanglement. Conservation Biology 14: 1264-1270 (2000)
Slooten, E., Rayment, W.J. and Dawson, S.M. Offshore distribution of Hector’s dolphins at Banks Peninsula: Is the Banks Peninsula Marine Mammal Sanctuary large enough? New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40(2): 333-343 (2006)
|