Do New Zealanders prefer to support charities with a local or global focus? And what reasons do people give for supporting different types of charity?
University of Otago Business School Professor Stephen Knowles is interested in the “landscape” of New Zealand donations – what affects people’s decision to donate, and what underpins donor preferences.
He and Dr Trudy Sullivan’s field experiment on charitable giving has found that charity in New Zealand really does begin at home.
A group of New Zealanders invited to take part in a survey on charitable giving were “rewarded” for completing the survey, with money to be donated on their behalf to a charity with a local focus (the Salvation Army) or with a global focus (World Vision).
Professor Knowles said this particular research method more accurately gauges people’s underlying donation preferences than simply calculating and comparing annual totals donated by New Zealanders to all charities. This is because of the “number of charities effect” where charities with a local focus may receive more donations, simply because there are more charities with a local focus.
Most of the study participants chose to donate to the Salvation Army. The most common reason was that they thought that charity begins at home; another reason being that they had seen the good work done locally by the Salvation Army.
The most common reason for donating to World Vision was that there was less help available, and therefore greater need, in poor countries overseas. Some donated to World Vision because they had donated to them before.
Knowles was surprised that so many (77 percent) supported the local charity, given there is a growing trend known as the “effective altruism movement“. This argues that because there is much more need in developing countries overseas, donations spent there can achieve more good than the same amount of money spent in a rich country like New Zealand.
Professor Knowles’ results are not particularly good news for the effective altruism movement.
While many New Zealanders do care about need in a developing country, how do they decide which developing countries would they prefer donations were spent in?
Another Otago research project (conducted by Professor Knowles, along with Associate Professor Paul Hansen, Nicole Kergozou and Dr Paul Thorsnes) identified some key characteristics that influence New Zealanders’ donations to charities like World Vision.
This study found that most participants would prefer that aid money goes to countries with high rates of hunger and malnutrition and to countries where children mortality is high. Average income, and quality of infrastructure such as schools, roads and electricity supply, were less important factors. Ties to New Zealand was considered the least significant issue.
Professor Knowles has found in other research (with Maroš Servátka and Dr Sullivan) that donors are more likely to give to charities when there is no deadline specified by which they need to donate.
These studies will all help inform charities, particularly those with an overseas focus, of how best to engage with and appeal to their supporters.