Thursday, 2 August 2018
The McAuley Professor of International Health at the University of Otago is labelling the findings of new international collaborative research a step forward in the fight to eliminate the world’s top infectious disease killer, tuberculosis.
Professor Philip Hill was involved in the research, published today in the world-leading New England Journal of Medicine, which evaluated the effectiveness of a new way to prevent people with latent tuberculosis infection developing the full-blown disease.
Results show a four-month daily regimen of antibiotic rifampicin in both adults and children is as effective as a nine-month daily regimen of another antibiotic, isoniazid.
“Not only was it as effective at preventing tuberculosis, but the participants were more likely to complete the course and had fewer side effects,” Professor Hill explains.
“This is a real step forward in our aspiration to eliminate tuberculosis. It means we can now offer a more attractive option to the many millions of people in the world who are at risk of developing tuberculosis.”
Tuberculosis is a major global health problem. It is estimated a quarter of the world’s population are infected with the pathogen that causes tuberculosis and very few of them are offered preventive treatment to stop them developing the disease.
“Importantly, we know that if we don’t find a way to give them preventive treatment, we will never eliminate tuberculosis from the planet,” Professor Hill says.
Led by Professor Dick Menzies from McGill University in Canada, the study recruited individuals in Canada, Indonesia, Guinea, Benin, Brazil, Australia, Korea, Saudi Arabia and Ghana. Professor Hill’s group worked with collaborators in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia to enrol and follow-up 1,000 of the 6,900 participants across the study.
Professor Hill explains that most people who are infected after exposure to tuberculosis do not develop the disease, the mycobacterium stays “asleep” in their system. The risk can be brought down to close to zero if they have preventive treatment.
Traditionally, this has involved nine months of daily isoniazid, but the long duration of treatment and the side effects, including the potential to develop hepatitis, are major drawbacks.
While the results of the present study may not impact on the large part of the world’s population who are not offered preventive treatment, Professor Hill considers this may not be the case if researchers can discover an even shorter treatment regimen.
“One option already envisaged is higher dose rifampicin, which is now used safely for tuberculosis meningitis and is being evaluated in the treatment of tuberculosis of the lungs. Preventive treatment using high dose rifampicin for four to six weeks is an obvious option to consider next.”
In anticipation of the increasing importance of combating latent tuberculosis infection for the elimination of tuberculosis, Professor Hill and others have made this area a major focus of their research, conducting a wide range of studies with collaborators in different parts of the world.
It is hoped that some of this work will be done in New Zealand where, for example, Māori are likely to have a relatively high rate of latent tuberculosis infection. Although New Zealand has a low rate of the disease, new cases continue to occur with half of New Zealand-born tuberculosis patients being Māori.
Earlier this year Professor Hill received a $250,000 grant from the Health Research Council to further investigate tuberculosis among Māori in New Zealand.
For more information contact:
Professor Philip Hill
McAuley Professor of International Health
Tel 03 479 9462
Senior Communications Adviser
Tel 03 479 9065
Mob 021 279 9065
A list of Otago experts available for media comment is available elsewhere on this website.
Electronic addresses (including email accounts, instant messaging services, or telephone accounts) published on this page are for the sole purpose of contact with the individuals concerned, in their capacity as officers, employees or students of the University of Otago, or their respective organisation. Publication of any such electronic address is not to be taken as consent to receive unsolicited commercial electronic messages by the address holder.