Monday 3 October 2016 2:40pm
Photo credit: Andrew Digby/Department of Conservation.
New research from the University of Otago helps explain the recent history of one of New Zealand’s most iconic parrot species and the role humans played in their decline.
In a new study published in the Journal of Heredity, Otago researchers have found that the sharp population decline of Kākāpō was associated with the colonisation of New Zealand by Europeans, not Polynesians.
Associate Professor of Zoology Dr Bruce Robertson, one of the co-authors on the study, says a decrease in population size and genetic diversity coincided with European arrival, supporting the hypothesis that the introduction of mammals such as stoats may have been the primary cause of decline.
The Kākāpō, sometimes referred to as the owl parrot, is the world’s only flightless and nocturnal parrot. Previously abundant and found throughout New Zealand, the species now numbers only 155 living individuals that are intensively managed on offshore island sanctuaries.
Laura Bergner, who undertook the research for her Masters at Otago’s Department of Zoology, Dr Nic Dussex and Dr Robertson sought to better understand the causes of population decline and to assess the loss of genetic variation in the Kākāpō.
The study compared modern day and historical Kākāpō genetic variation and used population modeling to estimate the timing and magnitude of the decline since the arrival of Polynesians to New Zealand.
“We found that population decline in Kākāpō was not associated with Polynesian arrival but with the more recent European colonisation,” says Miss Bergner.
Dr Dussex adds that while Polynesians hunted Kākāpō for food and skins, introduction of mammalian predators may have been more important in Kākāpō decline than hunting by Polynesians.
“It is possible that an earlier impact of Polynesians on Kākāpō demography may have been eclipsed by the more recent impacts of European colonisation, but examining older kakapo samples, such as those from Māori middens, is required to shed more light on any impacts of Polynesian settlement on Kākāpō,” adds Miss Bergner.
The study also has important implications for Kākāpō conservation.
Understanding the time-frame of decline is a central question in Kākāpō conservation because it can give managers clues about what forces may have been at play in the decline of the critically endangered species.
“In this case, it is likely that mammalian predators were the main culprit in the decline of Kākāpō,” says Miss Bergner.
“Our results lend support to the current strategy of maintaining predator-free offshore islands for Kākāpō to live on. Although it was previously known that Kākāpō exhibit low genetic diversity, understanding how quickly this loss occurred can also help manage what genetic diversity remains.”
Dr Robertson adds that estimates of historical population sizes can give managers accurate conservation targets.
“If we succeed in the ambitious plan of eradicating all introduced mammalian predators from New Zealand by 2050, historical population size estimates could give managers a target for the number of wild Kākāpō,” says Dr Robertson.
This work was supported by the University of Otago and Allan Wilson Centre funding to Bruce Robertson and the late Emeritus Professor Ian Jamieson.
For more information, contact:
Associate Professor Bruce Robertson
Department of Zoology
University of Otago
Tel 03 479 4110
Mob 021 279 4110
Email: bruce.robertson@otago.ac.nz
Dr Nicolas Dussex
Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Anatomy
University of Otago
Tel 03 479 7376
Email nicolas.dussex@otago.ac.nz
Laura Bergner
PhD Student
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
University of Glasow
Email l.bergner.1@research.gla.ac.uk
Tel +44 141 330 6626
A list of Otago experts available for media comment is available elsewhere on this website.
Electronic addresses (including email accounts, instant messaging services, or telephone accounts) published on this page are for the sole purpose of contact with the individuals concerned, in their capacity as officers, employees or students of the University of Otago, or their respective organisation. Publication of any such electronic address is not to be taken as consent to receive unsolicited commercial electronic messages by the address holder.