Wednesday, 26 August 2020
The University of Otago’s leading expert on fibre and textile sciences has produced guidance on factors to consider when choosing or creating a non-medical, reusable fabric mask.
Professor Raechel Laing, Clothing and Textile Sciences, says controlled investigations on the effectiveness of reusable cloth masks are rare, and many gaps in knowledge exist.
The use of masks and other forms of personal protective equipment in healthcare is widely understood, but since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been debate about whether or not members of the general public need to wear a mask, and if so, under what conditions and of what type.
Professor Laing says reusable fabric masks vary, from the extent of coverage over the face, nose, chin; the security of positioning on the face; materials used (structural and performance properties, fibre content, finishes); number of layers and performance of the layered assembly; and sensitivity to repeated washing cycles.
Individual sensitivity to wearing a face covering for long periods of time vary too, with potential adverse effects such as poorer thermal balance, and skin irritation.
However, in New Zealand mask use is currently mandatory on domestic flights from Auckland, and will become mandatory for anyone travelling on public transport throughout the country from 11:59pm, 30 August, under new government rules for alert level 2.
The Ministry of Health suggests a few masks for each member of a household need to be available for use, and some form of face covering is better than nothing when in public.
Based on current knowledge and in guidelines from the World Health Organization, the following suggestions may assist decisions related to reusable cloth face masks.
Guidance on non-medical, reusable fabric masks
The purposes of a non-medical, reusable fabric mask are either for protection of healthy persons (i.e. to protect oneself when in contact with an infected individual or an individual whose health status is not known) or for source control (i.e. to prevent onward transmission from an infected person, when their health status is known).
Reusable fabric masks are typically made from several layers of material, and it is the combination of structural and performance properties of these materials which determines the overall performance and acceptability by end users.
Simplifying properties and assuming all other fabric parameters constant, effects on key performance attributes are summarised in the table below:
|Permeability to air/vapour||Resistance to particle transmission||Thermal resistance||Tactility – softness||Absorption moisture|
|Fabric structure||woven < knit closely woven < loosely woven||woven > knit closely woven > loosely woven||thicker > thinner||knit > woven||thicker > thinner|
|Fabric thickness||thicker < thinner||thicker > thinner||as above||not known||as above|
|Yarn structure||c. filament > spun||c. filament < spun||c. filament < spun||c. filament < spun||c. filament < spun|
|Fibre type||not known||not known||wool > cotton > polyester||silk > other types||wool > cotton > polyester|
What is important to note from the table is that fabric structure has a major effect on performance (vapour resistance, resistance to particle transmission, thermal resistance, absorption of moisture), yet the focus is often on fibre type, undoubtedly reflecting the international marketing thrust of branded fibres and/or fibre-related organisations (e.g. Lycra®, Tencel™, International Wool Secretariat (IWS) Cotton Council International (CCI).
Internationally-agreed test methods (e.g. ISO, EN, ASTM) involve determination of the relevant property normally on a single fabric layer, however, re-usable fabric masks consist of layers, typically three layers. Therefore, tests of performance need to be undertaken on the layers, together, as in the assembly.
The principal material properties are filtration efficacy (resistance to particle transmission) and porosity (linked to ease of breathing), and a balance between these is needed. These two properties tend to be inversely related, with a material which is an efficient filter typically impairing ease of breathing.
Dimensional stability of the various layers with washing needs to be matched in order to avoid distortion and/or differential changes in porosity. Washing in hot water (~60°C) with soap or laundry detergent is required, and this needs to be considered in fabric/materials selection.
Use of 'elastic' materials, those containing elastane filaments (e.g. Lycra®) or very porous knit structures, is not advised because these stretch during use, increasing interstitial spaces and thus reducing filtration efficacy. A further reason is that many 'elastic' materials are adversely affected by washing at the high temperature required for cleaning.
Three layers of fabric are typically required for this type of mask depending on both the fabric used, and whether or not the mask design provides for an insert filter.
- The inner layer is in contact with the wearer’s face – soft, absorbent (i.e. hydrophilic, closely woven structure from cotton/cotton blends; silk).
- The middle layer is either a filter (typically non-woven) in a pocket OR a non-woven structure (e.g. melt-blown, needle-punched, other form) for which varied fibres/filaments/films are possible.
- The outer layer is exposed to the environment and functions to limit external contamination/ penetration through that layer (hydrophobic - closely woven structure from polyester, polyamide/ blends, cotton).
- (Non-medical, re-usable cloth masks require labelling for fibre content, country of origin, and a care label. Implied 'fit for purpose' requires appropriate evidence by the manufacturer.)
- While coating fabric for an outer layer or using a 'spray proof' coated fabric enhances barrier/fluid resistance, this tends to block interstitial spaces in the fabric and thus reduce permeability to air/vapour (and adversely affects ease of breathing). Further, unfiltered 'air' from the wearer may be released via the sides of the mask during exhalation. Coating is therefore not recommended.
For more information, please contact:
Professor Raechel Laing
Clothing and Textile Sciences
Division of Sciences
University of Otago, Dunedin