New evidence from the University of Otago, Wellington shows that government social investment in safer housing would be justified to prevent falls.
He Kainga Oranga/the Housing and Health Research Programme at the University of Otago, Wellington tested the safety benefits of home modifications, including handrails for outside steps and internal stairs, grab rails for bathrooms, outside lighting, edging for outside steps, and slip-resistant surfacing for outside areas such as decks and porches.
Study lead author Associate Professor Michael Keall says that the social benefits of preventing injuries through home modifications were at least six times the costs of the intervention.
“Moreover, this benefit-cost ratio was doubled for older people and increased by 60 per cent for those with a prior history of fall injuries,” Associate Professor Keall says.
The new study found that nationally there were more than 300,000 medically treated injuries from falls in the home each year, with an additional 150 deaths.
The research was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand, with assistance from the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), and published in the international journal Injury Prevention+.
The results add to the Home Injury Prevention Intervention study, done by the He Kainga Oranga researchers and published earlier in The Lancet*, which showed that injuries from falls in the home were reduced by just over a quarter (26 per cent) after the intervention. In that study, an average of $564 was spent per home.
Associate Professor Keall says that a national roll-out of home safety measures is supported by robust evidence and has sound economic justification.
“We think it could be implemented in a similar way to the 'Warm Up New Zealand' programme. Although only 20 per cent of New Zealand homes have been insulated, EECA-funded schemes (including the 'Warm Up New Zealand' programme) have been highly successful in insulating over 300,000 homes, clearly improving the health of New Zealanders in these homes,” he says.
“Although the safety modifications carried out for the homes we studied needed to be tailored to the house in a much more specific way than retrofitted insulation, we have carried out these safety modifications successfully in around 1,000 homes. The impressive reductions in fall injuries are a testament to the effectiveness of these measures.
“There is great demand for builders at the moment to address New Zealand's housing supply crisis. However, the community trust Better Homes in Taranaki, who carried out home safety modifications recently, employed semi-retired builders whose experience was ideal for the work they were doing. This work is less physically demanding than housing construction, and would suit many skilled tradesmen who are not currently building houses,” Associate Professor Keall says.
*Keall MD, Pierse N, Howden-Chapman P, Cunningham C, Cunningham M, Guria J, Baker MG (2015) Home modifications to reduce injuries from falls in the Home Injury Prevention Intervention (HIPI) study: a cluster-randomised controlled trial, The Lancet 385:pp. 231–38.
+Keall MD, Pierse N, Howden-Chapman P, Guria J, Cunningham CW, Baker MG (2017) Cost–benefit analysis of fall injuries prevented by a programme of home modifications: a cluster randomised controlled trial, Injury Prevention 23:pp. 22-26.
For further information, please contact:
Research Associate Professor Michael Keall
Co-director of He Kainga Oranga / Housing and Health Research Programme
Department of Public Health
University of Otago, Wellington
Phone: 04 918 6794
Mobile: 027 425 4675
Web: He Kainga Oranga/Housing & Health Research Programme
A list of Otago experts available for media comment is available elsewhere on this website.Electronic addresses (including email accounts, instant messaging services, or telephone accounts) published on this page are for the sole purpose of contact with the individuals concerned, in their capacity as officers, employees or students of the University of Otago, or their respective organisation. Publication of any such electronic address is not to be taken as consent to receive unsolicited commercial electronic messages by the address holder.