Overview
Are there objective moral facts, or should we embrace moral nihilism or moral relativism? Examination of classic answers to this question developed in 20th- and 21st-century philosophy.
This paper provides an in-depth introduction to one of the most vibrant and fast-growing areas of contemporary philosophy. Topics covered will include G. E. Moore on ethical naturalism and the open-question argument; A. J. Ayer's emotivism; Simon Blackburn's quasi-realism; Allan Gibbard's norm-expressivism; John Mackie's "error-theory" of morality; internalism and externalism about moral psychology; and contemporary naturalist moral realism.
About this paper
| Paper title | Are There Moral Facts? |
|---|---|
| Subject | Philosophy |
| EFTS | 0.15 |
| Points | 18 points |
| Teaching period | Semester 1 (On campus) |
| Domestic Tuition Fees ( NZD ) | $1,103.10 |
| International Tuition Fees | Tuition Fees for international students are elsewhere on this website. |
- Prerequisite
- One 200-level PHIL paper
- Restriction
- PHIL 234
- Schedule C
- Arts and Music
- Eligibility
- This paper will particularly appeal to students with interests in ethical theory, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language or metaphysics.
- Contact
- More information link
View more information on the Philosophy Programme's website
- Teaching staff
Course Co-ordinator and Lecturer: Professor Alex Miller
- Paper Structure
In the lectures, we will introduce some of the main topics discussed in 20th-century and contemporary metaethics, including:
- G. E. Moore's Open Question argument against ethical naturalism and his own brand of ethical non-naturalism
- A. J. Ayer's emotivist account of moral judgement
- Simon Blackburn's development of emotivism into his Quasi-Realism
- Allan Gibbard's norm-expressivist account of moral judgement
- J. L. Mackie's argument from queerness and error theory of moral judgement
- Internalist and externalist accounts of the relationship between moral judgement and motivation
- Nonreductive naturalist versions of moral realism
The seminars will complement the lectures; in particular, we will discuss a number of the primary texts that are mostly discussed in the lectures. Some will be available in Fisher and Kirchin (eds.), Arguing About Metaethics (details below); others will be available via Blackboard or as handouts.
- Teaching Arrangements
This paper is taught via one 2-hour weekly lecture and one 1-hour weekly seminar.
- Textbooks
Alexander Miller, Contemporary Metaethics: An Introduction (Cambridge, Polity Press 2013).
Andrew Fisher and Simon Kirchin (eds.), Arguing About Metaethics (London: Routledge 2006).- Graduate Attributes Emphasised
- Scholarship, Communication, Critical thinking, Ethics, Information literacy, Research, Self-motivation.
View more information about Otago's graduate attributes. - Learning Outcomes
Students who successfully complete the paper will acquire:
- The ability to make philosophical analyses and to present and assess philosophical arguments to an acceptable standard
- A broad awareness and grasp of what is at issue in general metaethical debates
- A demonstrated ability to explain and assess philosophical positions and arguments in their own words
- An ability to adopt and defend their own position in metaethical debates
- A detailed awareness and grasp of what is at issue in metaethical debates
- Assessment details
Assessment:
- Final 3-hour exam, 70%
- One 3000-word essay, worth 20%
- Ten seminar exercises, worth 10% in total
Overview
Are there objective moral facts, or should we embrace moral nihilism or moral relativism? Examination of classic answers to this question developed in 20th- and 21st-century philosophy.
This paper provides an in-depth introduction to one of the most vibrant and fast-growing areas of contemporary philosophy. Topics covered will include G. E. Moore on ethical naturalism and the open-question argument; A. J. Ayer's emotivism; Simon Blackburn's quasi-realism; Allan Gibbard's norm-expressivism; John Mackie's "error-theory" of morality; internalism and externalism about moral psychology; and contemporary naturalist moral realism.
About this paper
| Paper title | Are There Moral Facts? |
|---|---|
| Subject | Philosophy |
| EFTS | 0.15 |
| Points | 18 points |
| Teaching period | Semester 2 (On campus) |
| Domestic Tuition Fees | Tuition Fees for 2027 have not yet been set |
| International Tuition Fees | Tuition Fees for international students are elsewhere on this website. |
- Prerequisite
- One 200-level PHIL paper
- Restriction
- PHIL 234
- Schedule C
- Arts and Music
- Eligibility
- This paper will particularly appeal to students with interests in ethical theory, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language or metaphysics.
- Contact
- More information link
- Teaching staff
Course Co-ordinator and Lecturer: Professor Alex Miller
- Paper Structure
In the classes, we will introduce some of the main topics discussed in 20th-century and contemporary metaethics, including:
- G. E. Moore's Open Question argument against ethical naturalism and his own brand of ethical non-naturalism
- A. J. Ayer's emotivist account of moral judgement
- Simon Blackburn's development of emotivism into his Quasi-Realism
- Allan Gibbard's norm-expressivist account of moral judgement
- J. L. Mackie's argument from queerness and error theory of moral judgement
- Internalist and externalist accounts of the relationship between moral judgement and motivation
- Nonreductive naturalist versions of moral realism
The one-hour classes will complement the two-hour classes; in particular, we will discuss a number of the primary texts that are mostly discussed in the two-hour classes. Some will be available in Fisher and Kirchin (eds.), Arguing About Metaethics (details below); others will be available via Aoroa or as handouts.
- Teaching Arrangements
This paper is taught via one 2-hour weekly class, and one 1-hour weekly class.
- Textbooks
- Alexander Miller, Contemporary Metaethics: An Introduction (Cambridge, Polity Press 2013).
- Andrew Fisher and Simon Kirchin (eds.), Arguing About Metaethics (London: Routledge 2006).
- Graduate Attributes Emphasised
- Scholarship, Communication, Critical thinking, Ethics, Information literacy, Research, Self-motivation.
View more information about Otago's graduate attributes. - Learning Outcomes
Students who successfully complete the paper will acquire:
- The ability to make philosophical analyses and to present and assess philosophical arguments to an acceptable standard
- A broad awareness and grasp of what is at issue in general metaethical debates
- A demonstrated ability to explain and assess philosophical positions and arguments in their own words
- An ability to adopt and defend their own position in metaethical debates
- A detailed awareness and grasp of what is at issue in metaethical debates
- Assessment details
Assessment:
- Final Three-hour Exam (70%)
- One Research Essay (20%)
- Ten In-class Exercises (10% in total)